Claudia Sheinbaum – Vladimir Putin ¿Invitación en medio de la guerra?

𝚁𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚑𝚊 𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚛𝚎𝚟𝚞𝚎𝚕𝚘 𝚎𝚗 𝚕𝚊 𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚎𝚗𝚊 𝚗𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕 𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕 𝚕𝚊 𝚙𝚘𝚕𝚎́𝚖𝚒𝚌𝚊 𝚒𝚗𝚟𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚘́𝚗 𝚊𝚕 𝙿𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚍𝚎 𝚁𝚞𝚜𝚒𝚊 𝚅𝚕𝚊𝚍𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚛 𝙿𝚞𝚝𝚒𝚗, 𝚊 𝚕𝚊 𝚝𝚘𝚖𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚘́𝚗 𝚍𝚎 𝙲𝚕𝚊𝚞𝚍𝚒𝚊 𝚂𝚑𝚎𝚒𝚗𝚋𝚊𝚞𝚖, 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚊𝚌𝚞𝚎𝚛𝚍𝚘 𝚊 𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝚘𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚎𝚕 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝙳𝚛. 𝙹𝚞𝚊𝚗 𝚁𝚊𝚖𝚘́𝚗 𝙳𝚎 𝚕𝚊 𝙵𝚞𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎, 𝚚𝚞𝚒𝚎𝚗 𝚍𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚎𝚕 𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝙰𝚗𝚍𝚛𝚎́𝚜 𝙼𝚊𝚗𝚞𝚎𝚕 𝙻𝚘́𝚙𝚎𝚣 𝙾𝚋𝚛𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚛, 𝚑𝚊 𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚘 𝚎𝚕 𝚁𝚎𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝙿𝚎𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚍𝚎 𝙼𝚎́𝚡𝚒𝚌𝚘 𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚕𝚊 𝙾𝚛𝚐𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚣𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚘́𝚗 𝚍𝚎 𝙽𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚜 𝚄𝚗𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝚢 𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚖𝚊́𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚘́𝚡𝚒𝚖𝚘 𝙲𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚎𝚛 𝚖𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚘.

𝙴𝚕 𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚊, 𝚟𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚝𝚘𝚌𝚘𝚕𝚘𝚜, 𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚗𝚘 𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚛𝚒́𝚊 𝚗𝚊𝚍𝚊 de 𝚎𝚡𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚗̃𝚘, 𝚒𝚗𝚟𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚛 𝚊 𝚞𝚗 𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚜e 𝚕𝚎 𝚑𝚊 𝚑𝚎𝚌𝚑𝚘 𝚊 𝚖𝚊́𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝟸𝟶𝟶 𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚘𝚜 𝚎𝚡𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚓𝚎𝚛𝚘𝚜 𝚢 𝟹𝟺 𝚝𝚒𝚝𝚞𝚕𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚘𝚛𝚐𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚜𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕𝚎𝚜. 𝙽𝚘 𝚘𝚋𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎, 𝚎𝚕 𝚊𝚜𝚞𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚎𝚜 𝚖𝚞𝚌𝚑𝚘 𝚖𝚊́𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚏𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚘, 𝚊 𝚕𝚊 𝚕𝚞𝚣 𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚊𝚜 𝚌𝚒𝚛𝚌𝚞𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚜 𝚎𝚗 𝚕𝚊 𝚙𝚊𝚕𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕.

𝙿𝚘𝚛 𝚞𝚗 𝚕𝚊𝚍𝚘, 𝚎𝚕 𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚊 𝚐𝚞𝚎𝚛𝚛𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚗 𝚎𝚕 𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚘𝚏𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚟𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚁𝚞𝚜𝚒𝚊 𝚊 𝚄𝚌𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚊, 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚏𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚝𝚘 𝚋𝚎́𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚘 𝚎𝚗 𝚎𝚕 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚗𝚘 𝚑𝚊𝚋𝚒𝚍𝚘 𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚎 𝚊 𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝚋𝚘𝚖𝚋𝚊𝚛𝚍𝚎𝚘𝚜, 𝚢 𝚖𝚞𝚌𝚑𝚘 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚕𝚊 𝚟𝚘𝚕𝚞𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚍 𝚍𝚎 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚛 𝚕𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚒𝚌𝚒𝚘́𝚎𝚗 𝚏𝚎𝚋𝚛𝚎𝚛𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟸, 𝚜𝚒𝚝𝚞𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚘́𝚗 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚑𝚊𝚌𝚎 𝚌𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎 en el espectro internacional 𝚕𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚟𝚎𝚗𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚊 𝚒𝚗𝚟𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚘́𝚗 𝚊 𝚕𝚊 𝚝𝚘𝚖𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚘́𝚗 𝚍𝚎 𝚂𝚑𝚎𝚒𝚗𝚋𝚊𝚞𝚖, 𝚊𝚕 𝚝𝚊𝚖𝚋𝚒𝚎́𝚗 𝚕𝚒́𝚍𝚎𝚛 𝚛𝚞𝚜𝚘, 𝚚𝚞𝚒𝚎𝚗 𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚙𝚘𝚢𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚙𝚊𝚕𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚙𝚊𝚒𝚜𝚎𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝙲𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚊, 𝙱𝚒𝚎𝚕𝚘𝚛𝚞𝚜𝚒𝚊, 𝙸𝚛𝚊́𝚗, 𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚖𝚊́𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚅𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚣𝚞𝚎𝚕𝚊, 𝙲𝚞𝚋𝚊 𝚢 𝙽𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚐𝚞𝚊.

𝙰𝚑𝚘𝚛𝚊 𝚋𝚒𝚎𝚗, 𝚊 𝚓𝚞𝚒𝚌𝚒𝚘 𝚍𝚎𝚕 𝚝𝚊𝚖𝚋𝚒𝚎́𝚗 𝚎𝚡 𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚘𝚛 𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚊 𝚄𝙽𝙰𝙼, 𝚎𝚕 𝙳𝚘𝚌𝚝𝚘𝚛 𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚊 𝙵𝚞𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎, 𝚚𝚞𝚒𝚎𝚗 𝚌𝚘𝚘𝚛𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚘́𝚕𝚊 𝚒𝚗𝚟𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚘́𝚗, 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊 𝚏𝚞𝚎 𝚑𝚎𝚌𝚑𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚊 𝚌𝚞𝚊𝚕𝚚𝚞𝚒𝚎𝚛 𝚘𝚝𝚛𝚘 𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚘, 𝚜𝚒𝚗 𝚜𝚊𝚋𝚎𝚛 𝚜𝚒 𝙿𝚞𝚝𝚒𝚗 𝚊𝚌𝚞𝚍𝚒𝚛𝚊́𝚘 𝚎𝚗𝚟𝚒𝚊𝚛𝚊́𝚞𝚗 𝚛𝚎𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎, 𝚘 𝚜𝚒 𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚛𝚊́𝚗 𝚞𝚗𝚊 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚊 𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚊𝚓𝚊𝚍𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚁𝚞𝚜𝚒𝚊 𝚎𝚗 𝙼𝚎́𝚡𝚒𝚌𝚘.

𝙻𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚊 𝚞𝚗 𝚑𝚎𝚌𝚑𝚘, 𝚜𝚘𝚗 𝚕𝚘𝚜 «𝚙𝚛𝚘s 𝚢 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚜» 𝚍𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚟𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚛 𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚒𝚎𝚗 𝚝𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚎 𝚞𝚗𝚊 𝚘𝚛𝚍𝚎𝚗 𝚍𝚎 𝚊𝚛𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚘 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚎 𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚊 𝙲𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚎 𝙿𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚕 𝙸𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕, 𝚘́𝚛𝚐𝚊𝚗𝚘 𝚓𝚞𝚍𝚒𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚕 𝚍𝚎 𝙽𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚜 𝚄𝚗𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚜, 𝚌𝚘𝚗 𝚜𝚞 𝚋𝚊𝚜𝚎 𝚎𝚗 𝙻𝚊 H𝚊𝚢𝚊, 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚕𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚎𝚣𝚘́𝚊 𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚊𝚛 𝚎𝚏𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚘 𝚎𝚗 𝙿𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚘 𝙽𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕, 𝚊 𝚕𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚎𝚕 𝙿𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚜𝚘𝚜𝚝𝚞𝚟𝚘 “𝚗𝚘 𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚛𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚘𝚗𝚍𝚎 𝚊𝚛𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚕𝚘”.

𝙴𝚜𝚝𝚘 𝚎𝚗 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚗 𝚕𝚘 𝚊𝚏𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚕𝚊 𝚏𝚞𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚊 𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚊 𝚖𝚞𝚓𝚎𝚛 𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚊 𝚏𝚎𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚕, 𝚊𝚕 𝚜𝚘𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚛 “𝙻𝚊 𝚒𝚗𝚟𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚘́𝚗 𝚊 𝙿𝚞𝚝𝚒𝚗, 𝚗𝚘 𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚕𝚐𝚘 𝚎𝚡𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚘𝚛𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚘”.

𝙰 𝚍𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚛 𝚍𝚎 𝚞𝚗𝚊 𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚛𝚒𝚋𝚒𝚍𝚘𝚛𝚊 𝚎𝚗 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊 𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚋𝚞𝚗𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚕 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚊𝚖𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘, 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊 𝚒𝚗𝚟𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚘́𝚗, 𝚊𝚞𝚗𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚗𝚘 𝚜𝚎 𝚕𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚒𝚎𝚛𝚊 𝚟𝚎𝚛 𝚊𝚜𝚒́, 𝚎𝚜 “𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚘́𝚖𝚘𝚍𝚊” 𝚊 𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝚘𝚓𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚎𝚕 𝚖𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚘, 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚞𝚗 𝚕𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚕𝚊𝚜 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝚋𝚕𝚘𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚙𝚊𝚒𝚜𝚎𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊́𝚗 𝚊 𝚏𝚊𝚟𝚘𝚛 𝚢 𝚎𝚗 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚕 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚛𝚞𝚜𝚘, 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚕𝚘𝚜 “𝚌𝚛𝚒́𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚐𝚞𝚎𝚛𝚛𝚊” 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚜𝚎 𝚕𝚎 𝚜𝚒𝚐𝚞𝚎𝚗 𝚎𝚗 𝚕𝚊 𝙲𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚎 𝚍𝚎 𝙻𝚊 𝙷𝚊𝚢𝚊, 𝚢 𝚎𝚗 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚘 𝚜𝚊𝚋𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚋𝚒𝚎𝚗, 𝙴𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚄𝚗𝚒𝚍𝚘𝚜, 𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚙𝚊𝚕 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚘– aliado 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚕 𝚍𝚎 𝚗𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚘 𝚙𝚊𝚒́𝚜 𝚗𝚘 𝚍𝚎𝚓𝚘́ 𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚛 𝚜𝚞 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊, 𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚞𝚢𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚜𝚒 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚘 𝚜𝚞𝚌𝚎𝚍𝚎 “𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚘𝚖𝚋𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚛𝚒́𝚊 𝚞𝚗 𝚖𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚑𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚘́𝚛𝚒𝚌𝚘”.

𝙴𝚜𝚝𝚎 𝚜𝚞𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚘, 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚎𝚗 𝚌𝚊𝚍𝚊 𝚝𝚘𝚖𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚘́𝚗 𝚝𝚘𝚛𝚗𝚊 𝚙𝚘𝚕𝚎́𝚖𝚒𝚌𝚘 𝚎𝚕 𝚑𝚎𝚌𝚑𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚟𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚛 𝚊 𝚝𝚊𝚕 𝚘 𝚌𝚞𝚊𝚕 𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚘, 𝚜𝚒𝚗 𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚘 𝚕𝚊 𝚕𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚑𝚎𝚌𝚑𝚘𝚜, 𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚟𝚒𝚝𝚊 𝚊 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚕𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚛 𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎, 𝚖𝚞𝚌𝚑𝚘 𝚖𝚊́𝚜 𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚊́𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚊 𝚙𝚘𝚕𝚎́𝚖𝚒𝚌𝚊 𝚢 𝚕𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚒𝚊𝚕 𝚍𝚎𝚕 𝚊𝚜𝚞𝚗𝚝𝚘, 𝚜𝚘𝚋𝚛𝚎 𝚎𝚕 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚊𝚓𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚘 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚍𝚞𝚌𝚎 𝚎𝚗 𝚎𝚕 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚘 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕, 𝚖𝚊́𝚜 𝚊𝚞́𝚗 𝚊 𝚙𝚊𝚒́𝚜𝚎𝚜 𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚒́𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚘 y determinante 𝚎𝚗 𝚟𝚒𝚛𝚝𝚞𝚍 𝚍𝚎 𝚊𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚟𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚎𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚝𝚘𝚍𝚘 𝚙𝚊𝚒́𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚛𝚎́𝚐𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗 𝚍𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚌𝚛𝚊́𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚎𝚕 𝚗𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚘, 𝚍𝚘𝚗𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚊 𝚜𝚘𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚒́𝚊, 𝚢 𝚕𝚊 𝚊𝚞𝚝𝚘𝚍𝚎𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚘́𝚗 𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚞𝚎𝚋𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝚎𝚜 𝚏𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚕.

𝙴𝚓𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚘: 𝙴𝚌𝚞𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚛 𝚢 𝙿𝚎𝚛𝚞́ 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚎𝚗 𝚎𝚕 𝚖𝚒𝚜𝚖𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚗𝚘 𝚏𝚞𝚎𝚛𝚘𝚗 𝚒𝚗𝚟𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚜, 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚎𝚕 𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚎 𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚊s 𝚛𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚒𝚙𝚕𝚘𝚖𝚊́𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚜, 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚑𝚊𝚋𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚜𝚐𝚛𝚎𝚍𝚒𝚍𝚘 𝚕𝚊 𝚜𝚘𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚒́𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝙼𝚎́𝚡𝚒𝚌𝚘. 𝙴𝚗 𝚎𝚕 𝚌𝚊𝚜𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝙴𝚌𝚞𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚛, 𝚕𝚞𝚎𝚐𝚘 𝚍𝚎𝚕 𝚊𝚜𝚊𝚕𝚝𝚘 𝚊 𝚕𝚊 𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚊𝚓𝚊𝚍𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚊 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚛 𝚊𝚕 𝚎𝚡𝚟𝚒𝚌𝚎𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝙹𝚘𝚛𝚐𝚎 𝙶𝚕𝚊𝚜; 𝚎𝚗 𝚎𝚕 𝚜𝚎𝚐𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚘, 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚕𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚘́𝚗 𝚍𝚎𝚕 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝙿𝚎𝚍𝚛𝚘 𝙲𝚊𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚘.

𝙰𝚜𝚒́ 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚗𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚏𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚖𝚘𝚜, 𝙼𝚎́𝚡𝚒𝚌𝚘 somos 𝚞𝚗 𝚙𝚊𝚒́𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚖𝚘𝚝𝚘𝚛 𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚊 𝚙𝚊𝚣, 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚝𝚞𝚘𝚜𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚝𝚘𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚞𝚎𝚋𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚎𝚕 𝚖𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚢 𝚎𝚜𝚘 𝚑𝚊 𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚘 𝚞𝚗𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚎𝚗 𝚕𝚊 𝚑𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚛𝚒𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝟸𝟶𝟶 𝚊𝚗̃𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚁𝚎𝚙𝚞́𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚊, 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚎𝚕 𝚑𝚎𝚌𝚑𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚜𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚟𝚒𝚝𝚎 𝚊 𝚅𝚕𝚊𝚍𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚛 𝙿𝚞𝚝𝚒𝚗, 𝚊 𝚕𝚊 𝚝𝚘𝚖𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚘́𝚗 𝚍𝚎 𝙲𝚕𝚊𝚞𝚍𝚒𝚊 𝚂𝚑𝚎𝚒𝚗𝚋𝚊𝚞𝚖, 𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚊 𝚖𝚞𝚓𝚎𝚛 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊, 𝚗𝚘 𝚜𝚒𝚐𝚗𝚒𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚎́𝚊 𝚏𝚊𝚟𝚘𝚛 𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚊 𝚐𝚞𝚎𝚛𝚛𝚊, 𝚜𝚒𝚗𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚏𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗 𝚑𝚎𝚌𝚑𝚘𝚜 𝚎𝚕 𝚕𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚑𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚘́𝚛𝚒𝚌𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚛 𝚞𝚗 𝚙𝚞𝚎𝚋𝚕𝚘 𝚕𝚒𝚋𝚛𝚎 𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎.